Flat Earth Logic

Flat Earth Logic

Menu

Flat Earth: provable and observable

How can China and blue skies be under our feet when the plane flys flat and level?

15) If the Earth were truly a sphere 25,000 miles in circumference, airplane pilots would have to constantly correct their altitudes downwards so as to not fly straight off into “outer space;” a pilot wishing to simply maintain their altitude at a typical cruising speed of 500 mph, would have to constantly dip their nose downwards and descend 2,777 feet (over half a mile) every minute! Otherwise, without compensation, in one hour’s time the pilot would find themselves 31.5 miles higher than expected.

Do you really think that your plane is flying upside down from the position you started from if you flew to Australia? Australia is across the way not
Do you really think that your plane is flying upside down from the position you started from if you flew to Australia? Australia is across the way not "down under".

16) The experiment known as “Airy’s Failure” proved that the stars move relative to a stationary Earth and not the other way around. By first filling a telescope with water to slow down the speed of light inside, then calculating the tilt necessary to get the starlight directly down the tube, Airy failed to prove the heliocentric theory since the starlight was already coming in the correct angle with no change necessary, and instead proved the geocentric model correct.

17) “Olber’s Paradox” states that if there were billions of stars which are suns the night sky would be filled completely with light. As Edgar Allen Poe said, “Were the succession of stars endless, then the background of the sky would present us a uniform luminosity, since there could exist absolutely no point, in all that background, at which would not exist a star.” In fact Olber’s “Paradox” is no more a paradox than George Airy’s experiment was a “failure.” Both are actually excellent refutations of the heliocentric spinning ball model.

Endless amount of stars?
Endless amount of stars?

Above is on the subject gravity. 

18) The Michelson-Morley and Sagnac experiments attempted to measure the change in speed of light due to Earth’s assumed motion through space. After measuring in every possible different direction in various locations they failed to detect any significant change whatsoever, again proving the stationary geocentric model.

How can all the stars continuously rotate around the North star at the same speed and never lose there relative position to each other if they're at massively different distances?
How can all the stars continuously rotate around the North star at the same speed and never lose there relative position to each other if they're at massively different distances?

19) Tycho Brahe famously argued against the heliocentric theory in his time, positing that if the Earth revolved around the Sun, the change in relative position of the stars after 6 months orbital motion could not fail to be seen. He argued that the stars should seem to separate as we approach and come together as we recede. In actual fact, however, after 190,000,000 miles of supposed orbit around the Sun, not a single inch of parallax can be detected in the stars, proving we have not moved at all.

Simple observable evidence.
Simple observable evidence.
A great point here.
A great point here.

Is the world a spinning whirling ball or a flat stationary greenhouse?

20) If Earth were truly constantly spinning Eastwards at over 1000mph, vertically-fired cannonballs and other projectiles should fall significantly due west. In actual fact, however, whenever this has been tested, vertically-fired cannonballs shoot upwards an average of 14 seconds ascending, 14 seconds descending, and fall back to the ground no more than 2 feet away from the cannon, often directly back into the muzzle.

21) If the Earth were truly constantly spinning Eastwards at over 1000mph, helicopters and hot-air balloons should be able to simply hover over the surface of the Earth and wait for their destinations to come to them!

Earth spinning calculations? Hmm
Earth spinning calculations? Hmm

Think about this. LMAO 

22) If Earth were truly constantly spinning Eastwards at over 1000mph, during the Red Bull stratosphere dive, Felix Baumgartner, spending 3 hours ascending over New Mexico, should have landed 2500 miles West into the Pacific Ocean but instead landed a few dozen miles East of the take-off point.

23) Ball-believers often claim “gravity” magically and inexplicably drags the entire lower-atmosphere of the Earth in perfect synchronization up to some undetermined height where this progressively faster spinning atmosphere gives way to the non-spinning, non-gravitized, non-atmosphere of infinite vacuum space. Such non-sensical theories are debunked, however, by rain, fireworks, birds, bugs, clouds, smoke, planes and projectiles all of which would behave very differently if both the ball-Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning Eastwards at 1000mph.

Neil deGrasse Tyson said the Earth spins under long range bullets. But how when pilots, balloonists, etc don't have to calculate the spin? They go longer distances then the long range shooter.
Neil deGrasse Tyson said the Earth spins under long range bullets. But how when pilots, balloonists, etc don't have to calculate the spin? They go longer distances then the long range shooter.
Bowling ball and feather experiment proves that neither are being pulled by way of the amount of mass.
Bowling ball and feather experiment proves that neither are being pulled by way of the amount of mass.
Can you prove that an object attracts another object by way of it's own mass? If a bowling ball received more attraction then the feather then how can they both fall at the same speed when the medium, air, is removed? Simple, it's buoyancy and density acting according to it's medium, air. Take the medium away and they settle together.
Can you prove that an object attracts another object by way of it's own mass? If a bowling ball received more attraction then the feather then how can they both fall at the same speed when the medium, air, is removed? Simple, it's buoyancy and density acting according to it's medium, air. Take the medium away and they settle together.

24) If Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastwards over 1000mph then North/South facing cannons should establish a control while East-firing cannonballs should fall significantly farther than all others while West-firing cannonballs should fall significantly closer. In actual fact, however, regardless of which direction cannons are fired, the distance covered is always the same.

25) If Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastwards over 1000mph, then the average commercial airliner traveling 500mph should never be able to reach its Eastward destinations before they come speeding up from behind! Likewise Westward destinations should be arrived at thrice the speed, but this is not the case.

26) Quoting “Heaven and Earth” by Gabrielle Henriet, “If flying had been invented at the time of Copernicus, there is no doubt that he would have soon realized that his contention regarding the rotation of the earth was wrong, on account of the relation existing between the speed of an aircraft and that of the earth’s rotation. If the earth rotates, as it is said, at 1,000 miles an hour, and a plane flies in the same direction at only 500 miles, it is obvious that its place of destination will be farther removed every minute. On the other hand, if flying took place in the direction opposite to that of the rotation, a distance of 1,500 miles would be covered in one hour, instead of 500, since the speed of the rotation is to be added to that of the plane. It could also be pointed out that such a flying speed of 1,000 miles an hour, which is supposed to be that of the earth’s rotation, has recently been achieved, so that an aircraft flying at this rate in the same direction as that of the rotation could not cover any ground at all. It would remain suspended in mid-air over the spot from which it took off, since both speeds are equal.”

Ridiculous!
Ridiculous!

27) If Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning Eastwards over 1000mph, landing airplanes on such fast-moving runways which face all manner of directions North, South, East, West and otherwise would be practically impossible, yet in reality such fictional concerns are completely negligible.

28) If the Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning Eastwards over 1000mph, then clouds, wind and weather patterns could not casually and unpredictably go every which way, with clouds often travelling in opposing directions at varying altitudes simultaneously.

Reality debunks lies if we take the time to look at it.
Reality debunks lies if we take the time to look at it.

29) If the Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning Eastwards over 1000mph, this should somewhere somehow be seen, heard, felt or measured by someone, yet no one in history has ever experienced this alleged Eastward motion; meanwhile, however, we can hear, feel and experimentally measure even the slightest Westward breeze.

The fact that they tell you that you don't notice means that you HAVE TO TAKE THEIR WORD FOR IT. But I'm sure they wouldn't lie right?
The fact that they tell you that you don't notice means that you HAVE TO TAKE THEIR WORD FOR IT. But I'm sure they wouldn't lie right?

30) In his book “South Sea Voyages,” Arctic and Antarctic explorer Sir James Clarke Ross, described his experience on the night of November 27th, 1839 and his conclusion that the Earth must be motionless: “The sky being very clear … it enabled us to observe the higher stratum of clouds to be moving in an exactly opposite direction to that of the wind--a circumstance which is frequently recorded in our meteorological journal both in the north-east and south-east trades, and has also often been observed by former voyagers. Captain Basil Hall witnessed it from the summit of the Peak of Teneriffe; and Count Strzelechi, on ascending the volcanic mountain of Kiranea, in Owhyhee, reached at 4000 feet an elevation above that of the trade wind, and experienced the influence of an opposite current of air of a different hygrometric and thermometric condition … Count Strzelechi further informed me of the following seemingly anomalous circumstance--that at the height of 6000 feet he found the current of air blowing at right angles to both the lower strata, also of a different hygrometric and thermometric condition, but warmer than the inter-stratum. Such a state of the atmosphere is compatible only with the fact which other evidence has demonstrated, that the earth is at rest."

The atmosphere is moving in ALL directions at different speeds all across this world. What's the prove that the entire thing is moving with the Earth? The upper atmosphere would have to be moving faster then the lower atmosphere on a spinning ball to keep of with the massive whirling ball. But we sense a stationary greenhouse don't we???? Please continue on with me and let's look at some logic togather. No simply repeating things we can't prove or observe. Come on let's go further down this rabbit hole. I think I hear NASA looking for some curved water down there.
The atmosphere is moving in ALL directions at different speeds all across this world. What's the prove that the entire thing is moving with the Earth? The upper atmosphere would have to be moving faster then the lower atmosphere on a spinning ball to keep of with the massive whirling ball. But we sense a stationary greenhouse don't we???? Please continue on with me and let's look at some logic togather. No simply repeating things we can't prove or observe. Come on let's go further down this rabbit hole. I think I hear NASA looking for some curved water down there.